Save Time & Money: Choosing Between MVP, PoC, and Prototype

Building a product isn’t just about having a great plan. You need to prove it works, solves a real problem, and makes financial sense. Otherwise, you risk wasting time and money. In a fast-moving world, testing before going all in isn’t a luxury. It’s a necessity. Making decisions based on data instead of gut feelings can be the difference between a market success and an expensive failure.

What’s the best way for you to approach this? There are three main options, and chances are you’ve already heard of them. Why? Because their popularity didn’t come out of nowhere. The most successful companies got their start with Minimum Viable Product (MVP), Proof of Concept (PoC), and Prototype. Each serves a different purpose:

• An MVP is a simple version you can launch to test with real users. 
• A PoC checks if something is technically possible. 
• A Prototype creates a working model. 

Picking the right one can save you from costly mistakes and help you move forward faster.

In this article, we’ll break down MVPs, PoCs, and Prototypes. What they are, how they work, and when you should use them. We’ll also take a look at real-world examples from the financial industry in the second part of the text to show you these strategies in practice.

Understanding MVP, PoC, and Prototype: A Quick Overview

Before we dive deeper into examples, let’s briefly define MVP, PoC, and Prototype. Each one helps you test your ideas or concepts in different ways. Understanding them will help you avoid common pitfalls and create a better product.

MVP, PoC, and Prototype visualization with phone, light bulb, clock, and tools icons.

• Minimum Viable Product (MVP):
  An MVP is the simplest version of a product that includes only the core features needed for real users to test it and give feedback. You need an MVP when you want to quickly enter the market, validate your ideas, and gather insights before committing more resources. It’s a way to learn with minimal risk, ensuring the final product meets your target audience’s needs.
• Proof of Concept (PoC):
  A PoC is a small-scale experiment designed to test if a concept can work in a real-world environment before full software development. You need a PoC when you’re unsure if a solution is technically feasible, like testing a new integration. It helps you determine whether the idea is worth pursuing before investing significant time or resources.
• Prototype:
  A prototype is an early model of a product used to test and refine a concept before full-scale development. You need a prototype when you want to see how the product will look, feel, and function, and get customers’ feedback early in the process. Unlike a PoC, which focuses on technical feasibility, a prototype focuses on user experience and design, helping you spot issues and improve the product before it’s fully built.

As you can see, each approach serves a different purpose. MVP focuses on validating core features with real users, PoC tests whether a concept is technically feasible, and a prototype helps refine the user experience and design. 

Understanding these methods allows you to choose the right one for each stage of development and the initial phases of project management, minimizing risks and improving the final product. Here’s the short comparison between MVP, PoC, and Prototype:

Comparison of MVP, PoC, and Prototype: Advantages, Disadvantages and When to Use.

MVP: How to Acquire Early Customers and Gather Feedback

MVP visualization.

Have you ever spent months working on something no one needs? An MVP (Minimum Viable Product) helps you avoid that. Instead of making a full product, you launch a basic version with just the key features. Real users try it, and you see if it works. 

If they like it, you can upgrade it. If they don’t, you adjust or move on, without wasting too much time or money. This approach allows you to gather valuable feedback early and make informed decisions before committing further resources.

Additionally, if real people are using it, it not only helps gather feedback but also generates some initial revenue, which can be reinvested into further development. The MVP is designed to quickly monetize your key features.

Advantages of MVP:

• Quick market entry – you launch fast and start getting real users.
• Validating the idea with minimal risk – you avoid spending too much on something that might fail.
• Collecting valuable user feedback – you learn what people actually want before adding more features.
• Building an early customer base – first users help shape your product and spread the word.
• Introducing monetization at an early stage – it elevates the perceived worth of the product. Users tend to be more committed and engaged when they’ve made a financial investment.
  

Disadvantages of MVP:

• Limited functionality – the first version might not be enough to impress users.
• Risk of losing customers – if it’s too basic, people may not come back.
• Incomplete market picture – feedback mostly comes from early adopters, not all users.
• High expectations for iterations – users expect fast updates, which can be challenging.

An MVP is like sending a rough draft into the market—it has just enough features for users to see its value. The feedback comes from real people using the product, giving you crucial insights on how to make it better. It’s not just about launching fast but learning as you go while keeping risks low.

The key is balance. Your product needs to be useful enough to attract users, but simple enough to avoid wasting time and resources on features that might turn out to be unnecessary.

Example of Creating an MVP Product

A financial sector company wanted to launch a system for evaluating businesses’ financial health and creditworthiness. They decided to create an MVP to minimize investment risk and test market potential.

The first version of the system included basic features: a simplified report with key financial data and an initial business assessment. The MVP used a subscription model, allowing the company to test its monetization strategy. Customers could purchase access to reports and explore additional features that are available in the full version.

Thanks to the MVP, the company quickly gained early customers and valuable feedback. They identified which areas needed improvement and which features were most in demand. This helped them refine the final product and adjust their business model.

The MVP also allowed them to monetize the idea at an early stage. The revenue supported further development, but more importantly, it proved that users were willing to pay for it.

PoC: How to Test Technical Feasibility

PoC visualization.

Planning to invest time and resources into full development? First, you need to find out if your idea is even possible in practice. How? That’s where a PoC (Proof of Concept) comes in. It’s a small-scale test designed to check if a solution works from a technical standpoint. 

Instead of building a complete product, you focus on key functions to see if they can be implemented effectively. A PoC helps identify potential challenges, validate feasibility in real-world conditions, and determine whether the technology can achieve business goals.

Advantages of PoC:

• Technical feasibility validation – tests if the solution works in real-world conditions and is worth further business development.
• Identifies potential issues – catches performance, integration, or compatibility problems early.
• Minimizes technical risk – confirms whether an idea is realistic before you engage a full development team.
• Supports investment decisions – provides proof for stakeholders, helping to secure buy-in.
• Regulatory compliance – ensures the solution meets security and privacy requirements, crucial in industries like finance.

Disadvantages of PoC:

• Limited scope – only a small part of the solution is tested, not the full product.
• Not production-ready – even a successful PoC doesn’t mean the final product will work.
• Test environment limitations – controlled tests may not reflect real-world challenges, like high traffic or legacy systems.
• Scalability issues – a PoC may prove something works on a small scale, but not for a full rollout.
• Higher costs after PoC – transitioning to full deployment often requires extra investment.

A PoC is like a reality check for a business idea. It doesn’t guarantee success, but it helps avoid costly mistakes by making sure the technology works before you commit to full development. Instead of building an entire product, you test whether a key feature, integration, or concept is technically feasible. If the PoC fails, you save time and resources by adjusting your approach early. If it succeeds, you have solid proof to move forward with confidence.

Example of PoC for Verifying Amazon Cognito as an Alternative to WSO2

A financial company planning a cloud migration wanted to check if Amazon Cognito could replace its on-premise WSO2 IAM system. The key requirements included advanced authentication, integration with existing applications, security, and scalability.

Amazon Cognito is a cloud-based identity management service from AWS that allows developers to add user sign-up, sign-in, and access control to their applications. It is designed for easy integration with AWS services and supports features like multi-factor authentication and social identity providers. 

WSO2, on the other hand, is an open-source Identity and Access Management (IAM) platform typically deployed on-premise or in private clouds. It offers more flexibility and customization, particularly for enterprise environments that require fine-grained access control, complex integration needs, or support for legacy systems.

To verify if a cloud-native option could be a viable replacement, they ran a PoC, testing Cognito’s integration with their main financial product, security compliance, and migration feasibility. A small-scale implementation was compared directly with WSO2.

The PoC revealed that Cognito didn’t fully meet expectations, mainly due to migration challenges—its built-in user store required additional synchronization. It also lacked the customization options available in WSO2.

After analyzing costs and strategy, the company decided not to switch to Cognito. While the PoC confirmed that WSO2 was the better choice, it was a quick and cost-effective way to avoid a misstep.

Not sure which approach is best for your product idea? Leave your contact info, and our experts will reach out to discuss whether MVP, PoC, or Prototype is the right fit for your needs.

First Name *

Email *

Please share some details

I agree to receive your newsletters and accept the data privacy statement. *

Submit

Prototype: How to Visualize and Test Your Concept

Prototype visualization.

Have you ever been trying to pitch an idea to stakeholders or testing a concept with users, only to realize that words and wireframes aren’t enough? Sometimes, having a prototype makes all the difference. It’s not a finished product but a working model that helps you test design, functionality, and usability. Instead of guessing what will work, you create something tangible, gather feedback, and make improvements. 

Prototyping helps you refine your concept, avoid major design flaws, and ensure that the final product is user-friendly.

Advantages of Prototyping:

• Faster feedback collection – you get early input from users and stakeholders, allowing for quick adjustments.
• Improves design process – helps test functionality and usability, leading to a better user experience.
• Helps identify UI/UX issues – reveals potential problems in navigation and interactions before full development.
• Improves communication – makes it easier for teams and stakeholders to understand the product vision.
• Iterative process – allows continuous improvements based on real user interactions.
  

Disadvantages of Prototyping:

• Focus on aesthetics over functionality – early prototypes might look good, but lack performance or security testing.
• Doesn’t fully represent the final product – limited functionality can lead to incorrect expectations.
• Time-consuming and costly – advanced prototypes require resources and can slow down development.
• Limited testing scope – a prototype may not account for real-world challenges like high traffic or system integration.
• Risk of miscommunication – without clear explanations, stakeholders might misunderstand the prototype’s capabilities.

A prototype lets you test your product idea early, so you can make adjustments before fully developing it. It helps you gather feedback, spot issues, and improve design. While it’s not the final product, it’s a key step in getting things right before you go further.

Example of Using Prototyping in Interface Testing

A financial company onboarded a client looking to implement a B2B and B2C credit system, even though the API wasn’t fully ready. To speed up the process, they created a prototype in WSO2, providing a preliminary endpoint for authentication and request sending. The responses were mocked, meaning the client received fixed replies but could still conduct integration tests, simulating real data flow.

This approach allowed the client to test the interface in real conditions rather than relying solely on documentation. Receiving responses from an actual endpoint enabled realistic integration testing before the final API was ready. The team could discuss interface improvements with the client based on real interactions, even though the responses were simulated at this stage.

The prototype also helped gather feedback from the client’s developers, who could comment on API responses and the integration process. While the fintech team worked on the final API, the client could develop their side of the integration in parallel. Once the API was complete, switching from the prototype to the full version was straightforward.

By using prototyping, both sides saved time, minimized waiting for the final API, and ensured a faster implementation of the credit system.

Examples from the financial sector show the value of testing concepts early. MVP lets you get user feedback fast and enables monetization and profits. PoC checks technical feasibility, while prototyping helps verify the product before the final version. These methods save time, money, and increase your chances of success.

Summary

Choosing the right tool – MVP, PoC, or prototyping – is crucial for your product development and risk reduction. MVP allows you to launch a simplified product version to gather feedback and test business potential in the market demand. PoC helps you verify the technical feasibility of an idea, while prototyping enables you to visualize concepts and test them with stakeholders.

Each technique has its advantages and limitations, and the choice depends on your project’s stage and goal. The key is to consciously combine these strategies to align the product development process with market needs, your company’s resources, and customer expectations, as this can determine your product’s future.

Want to test your product concept without unnecessary risk and wasted money? Fill out the form below, and we’ll get in touch to discuss the best approach based on your specific needs.

First Name *

Email *

Please share some details

I agree to receive your newsletters and accept the data privacy statement. *

Submit